| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
474
   |
Posted - 2015.10.29 16:47:20 -
[1] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:Can medium citadels get ability to store limited, and small number of capitals.
Currently you can leave in a small tower capital floating under a forcefield , this will probably be not possible in citadels.
This gets us from position where investing 100 mil in a small tower allows you to keep somewhere a capital "safe" to a position , that you can do the same investing a 7bil in a large citadel.
This will kill smaller groups operations.
Giving Medium citadel ability to dock 1-2 capitals could ease small corporations, including WH ones.
This ships can be even visible on the citadel structure , so every one will know what ships are docked, or if he can dock another.
CCP change from 100mil to 7bil investment , just to keep 1 capital safe is quite big change.
For big alliances ability to dock 1-2 capitals to medium citadel will not change much.
If you have capitols, where a very cheap Niggy is like what? 1.5-2B. Dreads start at 2.5B. I mean you got that sort of ISK you can afford the better protection of docking. 7B seams fine.
AKA the scientist.
Death and Glory!
Well fun is also good.
|
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
479
|
Posted - 2015.10.31 00:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
ThePiachu Avar wrote:Questions!1) CCP Ytterbium wrote:
X-Large Citadels: all ships can dock.
[/list] Does this mean that supers and titans can dock? The keynote from Vegas was rather confusing on that part, implying that they would be only able to tether. 2) Is there a limit to what system X-Large Citadels can be anchored in? Say, "only in nullsec / w-space", or "nullsec, w-space, lowsec", or will everyone be able to place them everywhere?
You do realise that you just made it really really clear that you have read nothing about anything *anywhere*. Seriously. Can we get posts just replaced with RTFM? Please?
AKA the scientist.
Death and Glory!
Well fun is also good.
|
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
479
|
Posted - 2015.11.02 09:12:29 -
[3] - Quote
The main reason we are hearing about this soo soon in the dev cycle is because they want feedback.
And yea is DOES take that long to "add a few structures" when they behave and operate in complexity different ways.
Typical Junior dev comment right there. I wrote my tic tac toe assignment game in just 2 days. Adding all that structures is like only a few weeks of work. Art departments can just give me the models sometime by Tuesday right?
Yea right.
AKA the scientist.
Death and Glory!
Well fun is also good.
|
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
493
|
Posted - 2016.05.03 23:22:18 -
[4] - Quote
Cyan Moonwinder wrote:Xindi Kraid wrote:That's only for mediums
larges only have one each for ice and ore while XL have one for all reprocessing.
They already stated this would be the case, larger structures can be more generalized both by being able to fit more services and that the rigs will be more generalized at larger sizes and more specific at smaller sizes. They're losing a lot of bonuses compared to starbases. A starbase can be a refinery, research lab, factory, with bonuses, all at the same time. Mediums were also supposed to be the starbase equivalent, as they said, and if they are not, they are failing on their word. Med/Large Citadel DPS is already sounding lackluster to even what a medium POS could deal, so why rip down a literal pillar of the foundations of EVE for a downgrade?
The said the new structures would replace these things *eventually*. But they also said there would be more specialized structures with bonus based around there intended use. Although you can use a citadel for refining. It is not its intended use, there will be structures in upcoming releases that give bonus to that sort of thing.
AKA the scientist.
Death and Glory!
Well fun is also good.
|
| |
|